{"id":124,"date":"2018-01-29T08:19:26","date_gmt":"2018-01-29T08:19:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bodybynaturesupplements.com\/wordpress\/?p=124"},"modified":"2018-01-29T10:38:48","modified_gmt":"2018-01-29T10:38:48","slug":"wheat-allergy-who-me-yes-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bodybynaturesupplements.com\/blog\/wheat-allergy-who-me-yes-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Wheat allergy, who me? YES YOU"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

With sales of foods labeled\u00a0gluten free<\/strong>\u00a0now reaching over 6 billion dollars a year, something truly profound is happening to the way in which Americans are perceiving the role of wheat in their diets. Once celebrated as the very\u00a0poster-child\u00a0<\/strong>of the health food movement, folks are increasingly rejecting this\u00a0“king of grains,”\u00a0<\/strong>and are now identifying it as being at the very root of their\u00a0health problems.<\/strong><\/span>

Detractors claim that the movement is just a fad, or worse, that those who have embarked upon it without an official diagnosis are a bit crazy. After all, simply\u00a0“feeling better”<\/strong>\u00a0following gluten elimination is not considered to be proof of anything within the conventional\u00a0medical system. Biopsies, antibody, and genetic tests later,<\/strong>\u00a0if nothing is found, and you still think gluten \u2013 this ‘sacred,’ omnipresent grain \u2013 is a problem, you might just get referred to a\u00a0psychiatrist.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n



But anecdotes and\u00a0“subjective experience”<\/strong>\u00a0aside, the type of clinical research that constitutes “Truth,” with a capital T, from the perspective of the dominant medical establishment, can be found on the National Library of Medicine’s biomedical database known as Medline<\/span>. This vast bibliographic archive contains over 21 million citation entries, which as of time of this writing, contains\u00a0<\/span>9,776 references to\u00a0<\/a>gluten

There has been a sharp increase in interest and research on the topic of\u00a0“gluten intolerance”<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 although we prefer to label the subject\u00a0“gluten toxicity,”<\/strong>\u00a0in order to shift the focus away from the “victim” back to the “aggressor,” the gluten itself.\u00a0In 1971, there were 71 studies listed on MEDLINE which referenced gluten. Last year in 2011, there were 514.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>

One of our many interests here at Green\u00a0<\/span>med iinfo.com\u00a0is to identify “<\/span>Problem Substances<\/a>,” which is why we have created an index by that name with 698 subjects listed from A-Z. If you navigate to Wheat<\/span>\u00a0under the “W’s” you will find a list under\u00a0“Advanced Topics”<\/strong>\u00a0with 205 health conditions and\/or adverse health effects associated with wheat consumption, all of which were determined solely through research in peer-reviewed and published medical journals indexed on MEDLINE.<\/span>

You will also find, below the listed diseases, a\u00a0“pharmacological actions”<\/strong>\u00a0field set which lists 20 distinct ways in which wheat harms the body, e.g. nerve-damaging (neurotoxic), immune-damaging (immunoreactive), inflammatory, etc.<\/span>

At present, the conventional medical establishment only identifies a handful of disorders likely to be caused by wheat consumption, such as:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n